===================================================
Accounting Research Manager®
Weekly Summary of Developments
May 2-6, 2011
===================================================

Accounting Research Manager subscriber,

The Accounting Research Manager database now contains this week's weekly summary of developments. Click the link below to access and print the fully-formatted Weekly Summary:

For detail, please contact info@hkcmcpa.us


If you do not have immediate Internet access to the Accounting Research Manager database, below is the text of this week's Weekly Summary.

Accounting and SEC Headlines

Repurchase Agreements -- FASB Issues Guidance on Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements
New Accounting Standards -- Checklist Updated
International Accounting -- Comparison of U.S. GAAP and IFRS Updated
Financial Instruments -- FASB Discusses Financial Instruments and Other Matters
SEC Regulations Committee -- CAQ SEC Regulations Committee Minutes Issued
International Accounting -- IFRS Foundation Publishes Strategy Review Report
Insurance Contracts -- IASB and FASB Discuss Insurance Contracts and Other Matters

=============================
ACCOUNTING AND SEC HEADLINES:
=============================

Repurchase Agreements -- FASB Issues Guidance on Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements
For detail, please contact info@hkcmcpa.us


The FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-03, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements. The ASU is intended to improve financial reporting of repurchase agreements (“repos”) and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity.

In a typical repo transaction, an entity transfers financial assets to a counterparty in exchange for cash with an agreement for the counterparty to return the same or equivalent financial assets for a fixed price in the future. FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (Codification) Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing, prescribes when an entity may or may not recognize a sale upon the transfer of financial assets subject to repo agreements. That determination is based, in part, on whether the entity has maintained effective control over the transferred financial assets.

The amendments to the Codification in this ASU are intended to improve the accounting for these transactions by removing from the assessment of effective control the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets. The guidance in the ASU is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The guidance should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early adoption is not permitted.

New Accounting Standards -- Checklist Updated
For detail, please contact info@hkcmcpa.us


We have updated our publication "Summary Checklist of Recent Authoritative U.S. Accounting Standards." This checklist is intended to serve as a reference tool to help users ensure that they have considered authoritative standards recently issued or approved by the FASB. The checklist is updated shortly after the FASB adds or revises content in the Codification. The standards are listed by source and a summary of the transition guidance is provided with a reference to the relevant Codification paragraph(s). Effective dates and application (adoption) requirements are also presented.

We have updated our checklist to reflect the issuance of ASU No. 2011-03, discussed above.

See our Literature Update for complete details.

International Accounting -- Comparison of U.S. GAAP and IFRS Updated
For detail, please contact info@hkcmcpa.us


We have published an updated version of Comparison between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. This publication was authored by Grant Thornton LLP and highlights some of the more significant U.S. GAAP and IFRS requirements as well as the major similarities and differences between current U.S. GAAP and IFRS. Emphasis is placed on recognition, measurement, and presentation guidelines, with less emphasis on disclosure requirements. This publication has been updated to reflect standards issued through December 31, 2010.

See our Literature Update for complete details.

Financial Instruments -- FASB Discusses Financial Instruments and Other Matters
For detail, please contact info@hkcmcpa.us


As reported in its "Summary of Board Decisions" publication, the FASB met on May 4, 2011, and discussed the accounting for financial instruments. The FASB discussed the characteristics of the instrument criterion for classifying and measuring financial instruments and decided on criterion for measuring certain financial instruments at fair value with all changes in fair value recognized in net income.

The FASB also discussed the classification and measurement of convertible debt instruments from the issuer’s perspective that qualify for the exception in Codification paragraph 815-10-15-74(a) and do not require separation under paragraph 470-20-25-12. The FASB decided that those convertible debt instruments should be measured at amortized cost in their entirety. This decision would not affect the classification and measurement of convertible debt instruments that require bifurcation under current U.S. GAAP.

The FASB and IASB (the Boards) held a joint meeting on May 4, 2011, and discussed insurance contracts. Specifically, the Boards discussed the unbundling of noninsurance goods and services and investment components. The Boards discussed whether noninsurance goods and services should be unbundled from an insurance contract in accordance with the principles for identifying separate performance obligations in the revenue recognition project. The Boards indicated their intention to be consistent with the approach in the revenue recognition project, subject to consideration of whether the pattern of transfer criterion is needed in this context and to future decisions on allocation. The Boards will consult the Insurance Working Group on the practicality of implementing the approach being developed.

The Boards also tentatively decided that an insurer should unbundle explicit account balances that are credited with an explicit return that is based on the account balance using criteria based on those being developed in the revenue recognition project for identifying separate performance obligations. An insurer would not unbundle implicit account balances.

SEC Regulations Committee -- CAQ SEC Regulations Committee Minutes Issued
For detail, please contact info@hkcmcpa.us


The Center for Audit Quality SEC Regulations Committee has issued minutes from its joint meeting with the staff of the SEC held on March 29, 2011. This committee meets periodically with the SEC staff to discuss emerging technical accounting and reporting issues relating to SEC rules and regulations. Topics discussed at this meeting included the following:

-Update on the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance personnel and organizational changes;
-Various financial reporting matters including: (a) potential financial reporting challenges related to the recent earthquake in Japan; (b) loss contingency disclosures; (c) preliminary financial information included in registration statements; and (d) disclosure of net tangible book value;
-Implementation issues and observations associated with the SEC’s requirements on the use of eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL), and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 114, “Technical Revisions to Codification of the Staff Accounting Bulletin Series”;
-Income averaging and the significant subsidiary test;
-Transition issues related to pending FASB accounting standards (leases, revenue recognition, etc.);
-Age of acquired foreign business financial statements in connection with filing Form 8-K;
-Determining smaller reporting company status following a reverse merger between two operating companies; and
-Determining whether a parent company has independent assets or operations for purposes of applying Rule 3-10(h)(5) of Regulation S-X.

International Accounting -- IFRS Foundation Publishes Strategy Review Report
For detail, please contact info@hkcmcpa.us


The IFRS Foundation, the oversight body of the IASB, has published a consultation document related to its current strategy review. The consultation document, “IFRSs as the Global Standard: Setting a Strategy for the Foundation’s Second Decade” (Strategy Review Report), seeks additional input from stakeholders on the following four strategic issues: (1) the IFRS Foundation’s mission; (2) its governance; (3) the standard-setting process; and (4) financing of the IFRS Foundation.

On November 5, 2010, the Trustees of the IFRS Foundation initiated their review of the strategy of the IFRS Foundation, now entering its second decade, with the issuance of its first consultation document. The current Strategy Review Report is the second such consultation document.

Comments on the Strategy Review Report are due by July 25, 2011.

Insurance Contracts -- IASB and FASB Discuss Insurance Contracts and Other Matters
For detail, please contact info@hkcmcpa.us


As reported in its "IASB Update" the Boards met on April 27, 2011, and discussed insurance contracts. The IASB also met separately to discuss hedge accounting for financial instruments. Regarding their project on insurance contracts, the Boards discussed whether a different approach should be used for the accounting in the pre-claims period for contracts, typically of short duration, that meet specified criteria. The Boards tentatively decided that:

-They would consider whether the pre-claims obligation should reflect the time value of money, based on their tentative decision in the revenue recognition project on reflecting the time value of money.
-The insurer shall reduce the measurement of the pre-claims obligations over the coverage period on the basis of time. However, the reduction in the measurement of pre-claims obligations should be done on the basis of the expected timing of incurred claims and benefits if that pattern differs significantly from the passage of time.
-An insurer should perform an onerous contract test if facts and circumstances indicate that the contract has become onerous in the pre-claims period.

Some of the documents listed above may not be accessible under your current subscription. For information about upgrading your subscription to include additional content, click here:

For detail, please contact info@hkcmcpa.us